A review of Nilo Cruz’s The Color Of Desire

By | October 7th, 2010 | 4 Comments

The Color of Desire, a two-act play by Cuban-born, Miami-raised Nilo Cruz, premiered last night at the Miracle Theatre in Coral Gables. Cruz, who won the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for Anna in the Tropics, sat unassumingly in the audience in a dark ivy hat as his play unfolded before a packed house comprised mainly of geriatrics.

The Color of Desire is set in Havana, in 1960, a year after Castro took power. With the revolutionaries already confiscating property and businesses, and putting their ill-wishers before firing squads, cool-lit Havana invites its bemused inhabitants to indulge in fantasy, if only to escape the frightening reality of Castro’s boots and beard for a spell.

The play opens on Leandra and Albertina, out-to-pasture actresses and probably widows. Relegated to costume mending, the women discuss how time has stolen their femininity.

“Old age is ruthless,” Leandra says. “It doesn’t give a damn what sex we are.”

Enter Belén, the women’s nubile niece, who is distraught about not getting the lead in her company’s upcoming production. But unlike her aunts, Belén has youth – perhaps the one asset even Castro cannot confiscate – and the prospect of her date this evening with a wealthy American shipper soon lifts her spirits. Her aunts share her excitement, but only because they hope the man will rescue Belén from Cuba’s shadowy fate.

When we meet white-suited Preston, he is abrasive and insincere, an American boor who has purchased – not, as he believes, found – a “sense of place” in Cuba. Nonetheless, he wows the easily wowed Belén with a literal snap of his fingers at the waiters in Havana’s swankiest nightclubs. By the morning, she is in love and anxious to be loved back.

As it turns out, the first date was an audition. Preston does not wish to court Belén, but merely to cast her in the role of Emilia, a seductress who fled Cuba – and a lovesick Preston – after her own lover disappeared (or faced a firing squad, we don’t know). At first, Belén indignantly rejects the proposition, but she changes her mind after Preston agrees to do his best, scout’s honor, to get her off the island.

From there The Color of Desire develops somewhat predictably, with Belén falling deeper in love with Preston while he obsesses over Emilia and his business’s inevitable seizure. With the Revolutionary Unknown hanging over all of the action, the audience knows early on that neither fantasy nor prayer will bring about a happy ending.

This is not to say The Color of Desire isn’t worth seeing; it is, particularly at the Miracle Theatre, whose intimate space is a right fit for a sensual play. But in the end I think Cruz misses the mark. The theatre-within-a-theatre-within-a-theatre setup is contrived, and the Revolutionary backdrop does not succesfully evoke the emotional urgency he is after. This is largely due to Preston’s being so unlikeable that Belén’s heartache fails to resonate.

While Cruz delivers many lines of his signature smoke-scented poetry (Belén’s “dark hair emanating a dark hope”), his script is laden with stiff and unnecessary elucidations of Communism, Cuban history, and character symbolism. At one point, Orlando, a bearded and booted revolutionary, clarifies for the audience that Preston, in his white suit and polished shoes, symbolizes Capitalism. Duh.

If the play itself was a bit disappointing, the makeup of the audience was more so. DON’T GET ME WRONG. It wasn’t that there were so many old folks there. It was that there were so few younguns. I mean, here we have the premier of a sexy play by a young Pulitzer Prize winner with Miami roots, and the majority of attendees are collecting social security.

So what? you ask. Well, for one thing, I would have preferred to have detected rapture instead of offense when Preston pinned a lingerie-clad Belén against his bedroom wall. (“Oh my God,” said the unamused septuagenarian seated behind me.) More importantly, a young audience would have hinted at a vibrant thespian class in Miami, one that might save the city from the purgatory of recurring runs of Wicked and Jersey Boys. Alas.

After the play, I spotted Cruz in the parking garage with Teresa Maria Rojas, whose kookiness as Albertina provoked genuine laughter and pity. I asked him if he prescribed the various modes of escapism explored in The Color of Desire — role play, fantasy, naïveté, denial, the theatre itself — to people who find themselves living a harsh reality. Considering how every character who succumbs to escapism in the play pays for it with tears, I was surprised to hear him answer “yes.” He said he had heard many stories of Cubans seeking escape through the arts, especially music. Fifty years since Castro took over, Cruz said, this is still the case.

“Escapism is a mechanism of survival,” he said.

***

The Color Of Desire, by Nilo Cruz
Actor’s Playhouse at the Miracle Theatre
Oct. 6 – Nov. 7
www.actorsplayhouse.org/


4 Comments on “A review of Nilo Cruz’s The Color Of Desire”

  1. 1 CL Jahn said at 8:15 am on October 7th, 2010:

    Previews are basically a dress rehearsal with an audience, and no one is ever supposed to write a review of one. Changes and adjustments are still being made – that’s why you get the cheap ticket.

    What you’ve done is the equivalent of reviewing a dinner the cook hasn’t taken out of the oven. You were graciously allowed into the kitchen, and you abused the privilege.

    Shame on you.

  2. 2 Jordan Melnick said at 9:25 am on October 7th, 2010:

    First of all, the play was billed as a “world premier,” not a preview. second, I did not even comment on the acting, which may change/improve after a preview (although I liked it well enough). I commented on the script itself, which I would assume won’t be changing much or at all.

    Shame on me for sharing my impression of a work that was presented to the public at the “cheap” price of $40 a pop? I don’t think so. Hell, I actually recommended The Color of Desire. Wait till I hate something.

  3. 3 CLJ said at 6:15 pm on October 7th, 2010:

    Jordan, the play IS a world premiere – a world premiere that opens on Friday. You saw a preview performance of the world premiere play, which is in fact printed plainly on your ticket and was mentioned at least three times before you bought your ticket.

    And the etiquette is clear; you don’t review preview performances, period. People have lost jobs over this. We take this breach very seriously in theatre. It’s better to recite Macbeth backstage than to review a preview.

    Script re-writes during previews for a world premiere play are typical. Stuff gets cut, stuff gets added; it really follows the restaurant example: you’re can’t judge the plated entree by the mess on the cutting board. You weren’t at the dinner table, you were in the kitchen.

    There’s a reason the critics don’t attend previews. Until the play actually opens, everything can change, even from a matinee to an evening performance. Entire characters appear or disappear. Entire scenes get excised. I’ve seen an actor go from his natural build to wearing a fat suit and back again. Any analysis is unfair as you might be commenting on something that’s already been cut or re-written – or altered by additional material.

  4. 4 Jordan Melnick said at 7:41 pm on October 7th, 2010:

    Let’s hope that love scene doesn’t get excised. Moving on.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.