Upper Eastside residents want gay club shut down

By | February 15th, 2012 | 7 Comments

Tokyo Valentino, a new lounge and videoplex that some Shorecrest residents believe is an adult entertainment complex -- photo by Sergio N. Candido

A  recently opened gay club in Shorecrest has drawn the ire of local residents who believe it to be an illegal adult entertainment complex. The owner denies it, but the City of Miami has cited the business and opened an investigation.

The club in question is Tokyo Valentino, an after-hours lounge at 8330 Biscayne Blvd. Customers who pay the $10 admission fee can take advantage of some features common for any lounge — a dance floor and a game room with pool tables — but there is another part of the business that has drawn the attention of city officials and residents: private rooms and viewing booths. The viewing booths fit two people, while the rooms feature leather day beds and flat screen plasma TVs.

Owner Mike Morrison says that the booths and rooms are meant to be places where someone can “grab a movie and watch it with a friend.” While the club provides some films (mainly ones targeted at lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender audiences, similar to content aired on Logo Channel), customers can also bring their own DVDS.

“If people want to bring adult movies to watch, I can’t stop them,” Morrison said.

Morrison denies running an adult club and says his business is an “after-hours gay and lesbian lifestyle lounge/nightclub,” just like Jamboree, a gay lounge a few blocks away on Biscayne Boulevard.

Some local residents, however, think otherwise. Just days after Tokyo Valentino opened, on the week of Jan. 23, a group of Shorecrest residents — both gay and straight — spearheaded a campaign asking the City of Miami to shut down the venue, arguing that it is an adult entertainment complex and doesn’t belong in a residential neighborhood according to city code.

City of Miami zoning rules define an adult establishment as any business which offers adults-only goods or services, be they movies or “opportunities for experiences or encounters.” The regulations also state that an adult business must be at a minimum distance of 1,000 feet from any public park, school, or residential area.

The residents say the club indeed sells adult movies and that the video booths and private rooms incite promiscuous behavior.

“I’m all for people having their business, but there’s a place for everything,” said Brian Amezola, Shorecrest resident since 2005. “Having a place like that in between an elementary school and two churches is just not the place.”

The city has taken the side of the residents. Code Enforcement Director Sergio Guadix says the club was cited for illegally operating an adult-entertainment business on Feb. 6.

The club had passed initial inspection. City records show that the 5,800 square-foot property received a retail permit last September. On Jan. 13, the venue also passed final inspection by code enforcement.

Guadix said that at the time of the initial inspection in January, the club seemed to be a retail establishment, but that it had changed significantly by the time an inspector visited the club on  Feb. 6  to follow-up on residents’ complaints.

The investigation is on-going. On Saturday night, a City of Miami code enforcement inspector accompanied by Miami police officers visited the club again but didn’t find anything in violation of code, according to Guadix. He said his inspectors will continue to “gather evidence against the property to take the case before the Code Enforcement Board.”

For his part, Morrison remains confident neither the city nor pressure from neighbors will be able to shut down his business.

“We took it to the attorney and he said: ‘Let them take it to court, they are not going to win,” Morrison said.

This post was produced in partnership with Open Media Miami.

Follow Beached Miami on Twitter (@beachedmiami) and Facebook and email and RSS.


7 Comments on “Upper Eastside residents want gay club shut down”

  1. 1 Marcos Fajardo said at 7:49 pm on February 15th, 2012:

    So, here we go again, more gay persecution! That is so 1970′s. The club doesn’t sell anything adult but merely flies the gay banner outside so the city wants to close it down? We are a gay town people! Get used to it! I live in the area and have no idea what elementary school that they are talking about. I would sooner have the Haitian churches driven out than a gay club that doesn’t encourage drinking alcohol. I haven’t been there yet but the area needs to get rid of the homeless and gangsters first. Any business is good business for the upper east side. Empty buildings just blight the area. Lets all just grow up and find some real issues to deal with!!!

  2. 2 Jake Bakker said at 10:01 am on February 16th, 2012:

    Look at Brian Amezolas Facebook page. He is the man who commented on the club.

    Typical white trash UFC fan in favor of everyone owning a gun as stated on his page. How about asking what we in the gay community think about a gay club opening in Shorecrest? My quick response is..”WooHoo!!!”

  3. 3 UpperEastsider said at 12:23 pm on February 16th, 2012:

    I don’t think it’s gay persecution, just open sexuality persecution. People don’t seem to have a problem with the gay club that just opened across the street (‘Eros’ I think) or the gay bar at 72nd Street, or Jimmys Diner lol…

  4. 4 avidseeker said at 1:48 pm on February 16th, 2012:

    Very funny! Playing the “gender card”. Most of the residents who are objecting to this business are GAY or GAY FRIENDLY. As someone who has championed and continues to, fight for gay rights I especially take exception to this accusation. The owner of Tokyo Valentino obtained a permit under false pretenses posing as a “retail” establishment because that is what the zoning allows. It does not permit adult entertainment establishments. Well, they do sell retail, but that’s not all. And they have changed some of their merchandise since oppositon surfaced. If we residents were homophobic, why did we welcome the supper club and bar EROS into our community? We did, and we are not.

  5. 5 Naddina said at 11:23 pm on February 16th, 2012:

    never mind the club keep the Churches away from children especially a School.

  6. 6 Obamafan said at 3:08 pm on February 17th, 2012:

    Its really interesting to see the reaction to this store/club. I went in yesterday to understand what all of the commotion is all about. The location is surprisingly clean and kind of cool. I strongly disagree with “avidseekers” statements. First, the location does NOT sell adult entertainment anywhere. Secondly, I was involved with the npu when the supper bar (sic) and eros opened. Many people vocally opposed these business’ also contrary to what “avidseeker” states. Strangely though “avidseeker” feels accused of being homophobic. At no time did the article above accuse anyone of being homophobic. I’ve generally found when people defend not being homophobic they generally ARE!

  7. 7 Brian said at 3:13 pm on February 17th, 2012:

    What about Boulevard??? That strip club??? To be honest, who the heck cares what goes on behind closed doors. How do men hooking up with each other, in an enclosed building, has ANY effect on children, adults, dogs, cats??? It is obsurd. The war on male gay sex lives on!!!!


Leave a Reply